null
1-855-215-2914
Free Shipping on orders $75+ (Shipping Details Here)
loginLogin
Cart Cart

Aviation Oil Outlet Aviation Oil Outlet

  • CUSTOMER SERVICE
    • Contact Us
    • Credit App
    • Quote Request
    • Shipping Info
  • ABOUT US
    • Our Products
    • About Us
    • Mission
    • FAQ
  • RESOURCES
    • Videos
    • Articles
    • Email Sign-up
  • login
    Login
  • cart
    Cart
    • Aviation Lubricants By Application
      • All Aviation Lubricants By Application
      • Aviation Piston Engine Oils
        • Straight Grade Mineral Oil for Engine Break-in
        • Straight Grade Ashless Engine Oil for Normal Use
        • Multi-Viscosity Mineral Oil for Engine Break-in
        • Multi-Viscosity Ashless Engine Oil for Normal Use
        • Multi-Viscosity Grade Oil for Light Sport Aircraft
        • Aviation Oil with Lycoming LW 16702 Additives
      • Aviation Turbine Oil
      • Aviation Hydraulic Oil
      • Aerobatic Smoke Oil
      • Aviation Greases
    • Aviation Lubricants By Weight
      • All Aviation Lubricants By Weight
      • Aviation Grade 65, SAE 30
        • Straight 65 Grade Mineral, Break-In Oil
      • Aviation Grade 80, SAE 40
        • Straight 80 Grade Mineral, Break-In Oil
        • Straight 80 Grade, Normal Operation Ashless
      • Aviation Grade 100, SAE 50
        • Straight 100 Grade Mineral, Break-In Oil
        • Straight 100 Grade, Normal Operation Ashless
        • Grade 100 with Lycoming LW 16702 Additives
      • Aviation Grade 120, SAE 60
        • Grade 120 Mineral, Break-in Oil
        • Grade 120 Ashless for Normal Operation
      • Aviation Oil SAE 10w-40
      • Aviation Oil SAE 15w-50
        • Multi-Grade 15w-50 Ashless for Normal Use
      • Aviation Oil SAE 20w-50
        • Multi-Grade 20w-50 Break-In Oil
        • Multi-Grade 20W-50 Ashless for Normal Use
      • Aviation Oil SAE 25w-60
        • Multi-Grade 25w-60 for Engine Break-In
        • Multi-Grade 25w-60 Ashless for Normal Use
    • Lubricant Accessories
    • Shop By Brand
      • AeroShell
      • BlueSky Lubricants
      • Mobil
      • Phillips 66 Aviation
    • About Us
      • Our Products
      • About Us
      • Mission
      • Privacy Policy
      • Terms of Online Sales
      • Online Shopping Security
      • Terms Of Use
    • Resources
      • Videos
      • Articles
      • Email Sign-up
      • Bookmark Our Site
      • Get Our Free Web App
      • Site Map
    • Customer Service
      • Customer Service
      • Return Policy
      • Contact Us
      • Credit App
      • Quote Request
      • Shipping Info
      • FAQ
      • Paypal Resource Page
    • Login Create an Account


    1-855-215-2914
    The Flight Blog - Read Articles The Flight Blog - Read Articles
    Back to Blog Homepage
    Drones and Wildlife: The Good, the Bad, and the Uncertainty

    Drones and Wildlife: The Good, the Bad, and the Uncertainty

    By Sarah Simonovich on Jul 5th 2016

    Will drones help or harm wildlife conservation efforts?

    Drones continue to grow in popularity, and they increase in numbers, they continue to spark debate; such controversy is likely to only increase as drone technologies and capabilities expand (and as the Federal Aviation Administration continues working to regulate them). 

    FAA recently amended its regulations regarding the operation of small unmanned aircraft systems (drones) in the National Airspace System: "These changes address the operation of unmanned aircraft systems and certification of their remote pilots. This rule will also prohibit model aircraft from endangering the safety of the National Airspace System." 

    The rules for operating drones depends on why you want to fly: be it "for fun" or "for work." Flying for fun includes only educational or recreational flying, while flying for work includes commercial/business applications such as aerial surveying, aerial photography, aerial inspections, etc. 

    Here is a summary of Part 107 of the Federal Aviation Regulations regarding small unmanned aircraft, published June 28, 2016 and effective August 29, 2016. You can also find the complete text of the Small UAS Rule here.

    Wildlife Conservation

    While drones are proving to be useful from everything from agricultural management to infrastructure maintenance, they are not without their controversy (although to be fair, what isn't these days?). 

    Take, for example, wildlife conservation. 

    Drones are already proving to be useful tools to effectively monitor and protect wildlife and natural resources. UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles) propose a safer alternative to conservationists and researchers to observe their subjects and they are often less costly and more efficient to operate than traditional means (light-aircraft crashes are the #1 killer of wildlife biologists, according to this article from Audubon). 

    Current experimentations using drones for conservation tasks include monitoring flora and fauna, fighting deforestation, and deterring poachers.  David Wilkie of the Wildlife Conservation Society told Slate correspondent Justin Peters, "For underequipped and underresourced park rangers, drones can be enormously valuable not just for detecting illegal activities, but far more for protecting the ecoguards from encounters with very violent illegal hunters." 

    But as with any conservation effort, one must consider a cost/benefit analysis, so to speak, to determine whether efforts do more harm than good. Some studies are bringing to light the potential negative effects UAVs can have on the surroundings, including those with the targeted effort for conservation.

    Wildlife Controversy

    Chris Sandbrook, a political ecologist and Lecturer in Conservation Leadership at the United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre, discusses the social implications of using drones for biodiversity conservation in an article for Ambio November 2015. In the article, Sandbrook acknowledges that drones offer a -flexible, accurate and affordable solution to . . . the technical challenges of nature conservation monitoring and law enforcement;- however, he argues the probability of -negative social impacts- and the need for concern -because conservation should follow good ethical practice,- and -because negative social impacts could undermine conservation effectiveness in the long term.-

    While Sandbrook's article is rather limited to theoretical implications of drone use (and not actual study), a study by Mark A. Ditmer, et. al, published 31 August 2015 reports Bears Show a Physiological but Limited Behavioral Response to Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. During the course of the Minnesota study, scientists flew a quadcopter near wild bears 17 times. The bears, who were implanted with sensors prior to the test, showed signs of significantly-elevated heart rates in almost all the trials-especially when the bears were surprised by the drone. Despite the change in heart rate (indicated an effect), most bears didn't act bothered by the drones' presence. According to Ditmer, in the most extreme case, a bear's heart rate increased by 400% from 39 to 162 beats a minute. This study occurred in a region "where bears are constantly exposed to farm equipment noises, roads, [and] traffic.”

    Questions regarding the impact of UAVs on wildlife aren’t limited to studies like these, either—the Pennsylvania Game Commission tried to ban drones from flying over its 1.5 million acres of game land. This proposal, however, was grounded when the Attorney General’s Office recently informed the Pennsylvania Game Commission that only the FAA can manage airspace, although game commissioners will consider amendments to its game regulations at its July meeting to prohibit drones from launching and landing within game lands. The initial proposal was prompted by a number of incidents disturbing wildlife, particularly Bald Eagles.

    The Future

    But even with this information (and theories), the data is difficult to interpret—it’s likely that the issue at hand will need more study before anyone can say with certainty whether the negative effects of drones on the environment are more detrimental than the good they do—because they do do good:

    • Orangutan Conservancy uses Conservation Drones in Indonesia to detect orangutan’s nests and provide information on land cover types and changes—so far, the tests have shown positive results.
    • Drone technology is also used in Africa, where the World Wildlife Fund is exploring the use of drones as part of anti-poaching technology
    • The Wildlife Conservation Society deployed drones to monitor a protected reef are for illegal fishing in Belize.

    Orangutan Conservancy uses drones to monitor orangutans in Indonesia 


    While drone technology is advancing, it's not a foolproof technology for wildlife conservation effects; however, the possibility certainly exists for the betterment of drones specifically for conservation efforts. For example, smaller, quieter drones might lessen the impact/distress in animals (such as the bears in the Minnesota study). There is also the hope that overtime animals might adapt to interactions with unmanned aerial vehicles, as many have already adapted to human infrastructure.

    Apart from advancing the drone technology, humans will need to be mindful with how they use this technology and whether their use of such UAVs directly impacts/harms wildlife--FAA regulations will hopefully mitigate this (to a point) but they certainly can't stop all illegal flying (like people who think its perfectly acceptable to fly drones around wildfires, therefore hindering firefighters' efforts to fight the fires. But I digress).

    • #General Aviation
    • #are drones bad for wildlife?
    • #are drones good for wildlife?
    • #benefits of drones
    • #cons of drones
    • #do drones harm wildlife?
    • #drone regulations
    • #drones
    • #FAA regulation
    • #how do drones help wildlife?
    • #how to drones harm wildlife?
    • #orangutan conservation

    You might also be interested in:


    Newsletter | January 2023
    by Aviation Oil Outlet on Jan 12th 2023

    Do You Use Our FREE Web App? Now you can save our website as an app on your
    monthly newsletter
    Newsletter | November 2022
    by Aviation Oil Outlet on Nov 22nd 2022

    Other Smoke Oils Pail in Comparison to Bluesky Bluesky White Lightning Smok
    monthly newsletter
    Newsletter | October 2022
    by Aviation Oil Outlet on Oct 28th 2022

    Shop One of Our Most Popular Products - In Stock While Supplies Last One of
    monthly newsletter
    !

    Subscribe to our newsletter

    Get the latest updates on new products and upcoming sales

    aoo logo
    Aviation Oil Outlet
    454 South Main Street
    Wilkes Barre, PA 18703
    United States of America

    1-855-215-2914

    E-mail:
    sales@aviationoiloutlet.com

    Follow us on Social:

    Customer Service

    • Contact
    • Credit Application
    • Frequently Asked Questions
    • Quote Request
    • Returns
    • Shipping Information
    • Sitemap

    Resources

    • About Us
    • Accessibility
    • Brands
    • Newsletter Signup
    • Online Shopping Security
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions of Online Sales
    • Terms of Use
    • Video Library

    Account

    • Account
    • Cart
    • Checkout
    • Order History

    © 2023 Aviation Oil Outlet

    payment method icons Bizrate
    ​